Logitech G

Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 (current standard-shape model)

Model G Pro X Superlight 2

By MainBuyer Editorial Team · Published 2026-07-13 · Reviewed 2026-07-15

Quick answer

Is the Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 (current standard-shape model) worth considering?

A proven lightweight competitive choice when its simple five-button layout and receiver-only wireless suit the buyer better than Logitech's newer specialist variants.

Best for: Lightweight symmetrical-shape competitive gaming

Reasons to consider it

  • Very low 60g weight without an open shell
  • Excellent HERO 2 tracking and high polling support
  • Long quoted battery life with USB-C charging
  • Powerplay wireless charging compatibility

Who should think twice

  • No Bluetooth or dedicated top DPI button
  • Only two thumb buttons
  • LIGHTFORCE clicks feel firm to some users
  • Newer DEX, 2c and Superstrike alternatives are available
Full research-based review

Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 review

Current position and shape

The Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 remains a current standard-shape model in Logitech's competitive wireless range, even though it is no longer the company's newest technology showcase. Logitech has since added the right-handed Superlight 2 DEX, the smaller Superlight 2c and the more experimental G Pro X2 Superstrike. Those alternatives do not make the original Superlight 2 obsolete: they serve different hand sizes, grip preferences and budgets. Buyers should nevertheless avoid reading an old launch review and assuming this is still the only premium Logitech esports mouse.

Its main attraction is the restrained, broadly accommodating shell. At roughly 60g, it feels substantially lighter than productivity mice and multi-button gaming designs without using a perforated outer case. The shape is symmetrical, but the two thumb buttons are fitted only on the left side, so it is functionally aimed at right-handed users. Medium and larger hands can use palm, claw or fingertip variations, while small hands may find the newer 2c easier to control. Shape remains more important than headline DPI: a technically excellent sensor cannot compensate for a shell that forces an uncomfortable grip.

Sensor, clicks and competitive performance

The HERO 2 optical sensor is the core technical strength. Current firmware and colour variants may advertise different maximum DPI figures, but extreme sensitivity is not the practical reason to buy it. The more useful qualities are consistent tracking, low lift-off behaviour, high-speed accuracy and the ability to store a familiar sensitivity profile in Logitech G HUB. The mouse supports high report rates, including up to 8,000Hz on current firmware and compatible hardware, although higher polling increases processor work and battery drain. Most players should compare 1,000Hz, 2,000Hz and higher settings rather than automatically selecting the maximum.

LIGHTFORCE hybrid optical-mechanical switches reduce the traditional risk of electrical double-click faults and provide fast actuation, but their feel is firmer and louder than some purely mechanical competitors. Click preference is subjective, and a light mouse does not guarantee light-feeling buttons. There are five main controls: left and right click, wheel click and two side buttons. That simplicity suits shooters, but it is limiting for MMOs, editing shortcuts and complex productivity workflows. There is no dedicated top-mounted DPI button, so changes are normally handled in software or through a reassigned control.

Wireless, battery and software

Connectivity is focused rather than versatile. LIGHTSPEED 2.4GHz wireless is the normal competitive mode, and the USB-C cable can charge the mouse while allowing wired operation. There is no Bluetooth. That omission is sensible for latency-focused gaming but inconvenient for buyers who want to move between a gaming PC, work laptop and tablet without carrying the receiver. Logitech's receiver-sharing options also depend on supported device combinations and firmware, so they should not be assumed across every Logitech peripheral.

Logitech quotes up to about 95 hours of continuous motion at standard settings. Real endurance varies with polling rate, surface, sleep behaviour, firmware and battery age. An 8,000Hz setting can reduce the interval between charges substantially. USB-C is a welcome improvement over the first Superlight, and the mouse remains compatible with Logitech's Powerplay charging ecosystem, although the charging mat adds cost and desk commitment. G HUB handles DPI, polling, button assignments and profiles. Basic stored settings can travel with the mouse, but advanced automation and application switching may still require the software running on the host PC.

Ownership verdict

The Superlight 2 is best for a player who wants a proven lightweight shape, excellent wireless tracking and very few distractions. It is less suitable for left-handed users, people who need Bluetooth, buyers who want many buttons or anyone who expects a premium mouse to include a charging dock. Replacement skates and grip tape are widely available, but opening the shell or replacing the internal battery is not an ordinary tool-free maintenance task and can affect warranty coverage.

Value now depends heavily on discounting. At a sensible reduction, it remains a strong competitive mouse because its fundamentals are sound and its mature firmware is an advantage. Near the price of the newer Superstrike, 2c or rival 8K models, buyers should compare hand fit and included features rather than choosing by brand reputation alone. MainBuyer has not performed hands-on latency or endurance testing; this assessment synthesises manufacturer specifications, established reviews and current range positioning.

Evidence and sources

What this assessment is based on

  • Official manufacturer specifications and model identifiers.
  • Retailer product information used to confirm availability and product positioning.
  • Established independent review coverage and recurring ownership considerations.
  • MainBuyer editorial judgement about suitability, limitations and value.

Research sources

This is a research-based assessment. MainBuyer does not claim hands-on or laboratory testing unless a page explicitly says that testing took place.

Editorial standards

Commission rates do not determine our verdict or page order. See how we review products, our editorial policy and corrections policy.

Last editorial review: 2026-07-15